Command line email tool for windows

Blat can store various default settings in the registry. The command line options override the registry settings. Input from the console STDIN can be used instead of a disk file if the special filename '-' is specified. Blat can also "carbon copy" and "blind carbon copy" the message. Impersonation can be done with the -i flag which puts the value specified in the "From:" line, however when this is done the real senders address is stamped in the "Reply-To:" and "Sender:" lines.

This feature can be useful when using the program to send messages from users that are not registered on the SMTP host. Optionally, Blat can also attach multiple files to your message. Blat no longer needs gensock. You can delete these unless another application you use requires them. You can use a gui to create the command. Link: chefsender. Or opera mail m2. Or TheBat. Or Eudora. Or Em Client. Dipisoft SendMail freeware software is another email sending tool for Windows which has a graphical interface but can also be used in command line mode.

It allows you to send attachments, can interface with the ActiveDirectory in order to send emails to groups or distribution lists. Finally, it offers the flexibility to declare several SMTP configurations via the graphical interface which can then be used by command line mode and GUI mode.

The tool is natively in French but it is provided with an English translation. The article is in French but you can translate it using the translation tool integrated into the site, in one of the blocks in the sidebar.

Mini-relay cannot be used to send mail from the command line. It only relays mail from other clients, much of which will end up in spam folders due to the sender not having their domain and server configured as per best practice. Great solution if you need to email automated responses from windows task scheduler where the option to email has been deprecated i. CMail and mailsend support both methods, so the examples should be updated to be consistent with the other products.

You may also wish to add notes about GMail authentication. Users may need to either enable the Less secure apps setting on your Google account, or configure an App Password if using 2-step verification in order to send mail via the service. I liked the CMail!!! Many thanks! SmtpMail by SmtpInfo is perfect. There is another cool commandline tool for sending emails: sourceforge. I thought I also failed with Google, despite finding a HowTo. I eventually got a test email sent from Google to another account, immediately followed by a Google system-generated email that my account may have been hacked.

I cannot find out how to program that because there is no info about it. So, the thing that might work for me I want to send myself an automatic email when a long programming build is finished is to sign up for yet another Gmail account, lower its security settings, and use that instead of the real Google account. I want to use AutoIT found a script for that! SteveHolland 5 months ago. Rakesh Dadhich 11 months ago. Instead of re-inventing the wheel, check out the following Microsoft article for more info on netsh.

The use of Windows command line tools can be a powerful alternative when only a command prompt is available. I'm sure there are plenty more commands that I have not mention. This is Windows command line swiss knife, even though it requires some practice to get used to…. I'm using NVER command. You seem to have spent a great deal of attention on the Windows built-in command-line tools. Perhaps you can help me:. My goal is to pipe PIDs from tasklist into netstat, so as to see what ports certain processes are using, and I am restricted to using only built-in Windows commands.

Windows commands just don't have this type of functionality and since I also managed Linux servers, using the same set of command line tools made administraion easy across both OS's.

You may want to check out Windows Power Shell I don't use it only because I don't have the time to learn a new scripting language. It's a relief to have some confirmation of the absence of these tools. I thought I just could not find them, but that they must exist. Thank you. I want to find out what ports are being used by any processes of a given imagename. Not sure how I could be more specific than that.

Clearly, I should look this up. I'm new to Windows scripting! I read some tutorials about search-and-replace in variables. If I recall correctly, the replacement only affects the value which the variable evaluates to that time — not the underlying value actually stored in the variable. If you have a good tutorial to recommend, I'd take another look at it.

It always returns the whole line in which the regex matches, when I only want to backreference the matching parts. Well, that's two recommendations for PowerShell so far! I will see if I can use that. I do have SP2 available. If you have a chance to use PowerShell, don't bother yourself with batches. As I said, it is not even possible to compare them PowerShell is more like.

NET shell. I would love to write that script for you, however netstat doesn't work on my PC duh, haven't seen that before ;. You will use FindStr to retrieve just lines where your process is mentioned. I should repeat that the restriction I'm working under is "only tools that come standard with recent Windows".

Unfortunately this rules out the many handy Unix-type for Windows tools. BUT, at least where I've tried it, the process name always displays on a new line, below the port information. Or is there something I'm overlooking? If I were using grep, it would be easy to tell it to give me 1 line's context before the match.

The above command works for me. It's surely wasteful, since it re-runs netstat for each matching token — but it gives me what I needed. Thank you both, Watching The Net Mike? And if you see a way to improve on the above, please let me know it!

Anyway, still don't understand why you need tasklist — you already know process name, so what's the reason for using it? There are a lot of irrelevant processes with TCP ports open…. It is true that I know the process name from the get-go.

But I do not know a way to tell Netstat to pre-filter by process name I wish it could!