21st century assessment tools

In addition, students do not have a choice about how best to represent the data collected; it is given. The item is constrained, requiring students to select from a set of tools, and these constraints reinforce the task and cognitive demands placed on students.

Finally, it requires some written communication. Noting that a review of the TIMSS Science Booklet 8 test identified no items that measure strategic knowledge Li, Ruiz-Primo, and Shavelson, , Ruiz-Primo said that computer technology now makes it possible to track the strategies students use when applying information to solve problems.

The program has been used to assess science learning in K, undergraduate, and medical education. On the basis of her analysis of these items, Ruiz-Primo concluded that similar tasks should be considered for assessing 21st century skills. She offered four recommendations for future research and development of assessments of 21st century skills.

First, she said, it is important to more carefully define the 21st century skills of interest. Second, for the purposes of developing large-scale assessments, it is important to identify the most critical skills, as she did when focusing on nonroutine problem solving and complex communication.

Third, she said it is important to define the purposes of assessments designed to measure 21st century skills, such as to provide information for school accountability, to evaluate individual student progress, to focus public attention on educational concerns, or to change educational practices by influencing curriculum and instruction. She observed that different purposes require different sources of evidence to evaluate the validity of the assessment.

Fourth, she said that computer-based technology can support the development, administration, and scoring of large-scale assessments of 21st century skills. Session moderator Marcia Linn thanked Ruiz-Primo and Houston, observing that they had posed important questions about how to define the construct of 21st century skills, as well as how to measure this construct.

She observed that Houston had demonstrated the importance of the goal of assessing 21st century skills by showing how much money private firms are willing to invest in assessments of these skills, as well as the cost savings that result from the use of these assessments. Noting that the presenters had suggested using technology to assess 21st century skills, Linn said that technology offers opportunities for synergy between the curriculum and the assessment. Linn suggested that teachers could score new types of science assessments capable of measuring 21st century skills.

She said that, in the Netherlands, where complex assessments are used, schools send the completed assessments to other schools for grading. This process offers learning opportunities for teachers as well as students.

Linn then invited the audience to write down their reflections and questions about the session in their carbonless notebooks. After several minutes, she invited the audience to pose questions about the session and also to recommend policies or programs to support development of 21st century skills in science education.

Some states have already adopted educational standards incorporating 21st century skills and are beginning to develop assessments aligned with these new standards. Educational assessments are standardized for all students, in contrast to the process in the corporate world, which involves tailoring each assessment to a particular workplace or job. Corporate assessment must be tailored in order to be most relevant for the job and to be the most valid predictor of future job performance.

In education, if the purpose is large-scale assessment, the same standardized test should be administered to all students. However, if a teacher wants to know how well her students have learned following a unit of instruction focused on 21st century skills, it may be appropriate to create a unique assessment.

Although educational assessments measure individual skills, the value of a skill such as adaptability may be realized in groups, rather than as an attribute of separate individuals. From this perspective, it is important to think about assessment of people in groups.

Online assessments can be manipulated to engage students in solving a problem with others who are not physically present. This approach could be used to assess a dimension of self-management—the ability to work as a member of a virtual team Houston, Assessments can also be manipulated to change the status of the test-taker in order to assess adaptability.

For example, a student may initially be asked to solve the problem individually, and then be told to collaborate with other students. This change of status could be used to assess adaptability, collaboration, and complex communication skills. In corporate assessment, the goal is for each individual to possess adaptability and other 21st century skills, as well as for groups to have these skills. Job performance tests of adaptability are sometimes used to identify those individuals who may be best able to cope with, and adapt to, physically dangerous situations.

An emerging body of research suggests that a set of broad "21st century skills"—such as adaptability, complex communication skills, and the ability to solve non-routine problems—are valuable across a wide range of jobs in the national economy. However, the role of K education in helping students learn these skills is a subject of current debate.

Some business and education groups have advocated infusing 21st century skills into the school curriculum, and several states have launched such efforts. Other observers argue that focusing on skills detracts attention from learning of important content knowledge. To explore these issues, the National Research Council conducted a workshop, summarized in this volume, on science education as a context for development of 21st century skills.

Science is seen as a promising context because it is not only a body of accepted knowledge, but also involves processes that lead to this knowledge. Engaging students in scientific processes—including talk and argument, modeling and representation, and learning from investigations—builds science proficiency. At the same time, this engagement may develop 21st century skills. Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills addresses key questions about the overlap between 21st century skills and scientific content and knowledge; explores promising models or approaches for teaching these abilities; and reviews the evidence about the transferability of these skills to real workplace applications.

Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website. Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book. Switch between the Original Pages , where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter. Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available. Do you enjoy reading reports from the Academies online for free? Sign up for email notifications and we'll let you know about new publications in your areas of interest when they're released. Get This Book. Visit NAP. Looking for other ways to read this?

No thanks. Suggested Citation: "7 Assessment of 21st Century Skills. Page 71 Share Cite. Role Play. Page 72 Share Cite. Situated Judgment Tests. Page 73 Share Cite. Model of Assessment Development. Page 74 Share Cite.

The review concluded that students who are proficient in science should: know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world; generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations; understand the nature and development of scientific knowledge; and participate productively in scientific practices and discourse. Proposed Construct. Page 75 Share Cite. Page 76 Share Cite. An Approach to Developing and Evaluating Assessments.

Page 77 Share Cite. Finally, she observed that a problem may vary in the extent of communication required to respond, with a selected or short-answer item requiring less writing and a constructed-response item TABLE Dimensions of Problem Complexity Disposition Cross-Functional Skills General Description 1.

Defined by the developer Routine Nonroutine Routine. Depends on the examinee Lean Rich Richness. Number of activities and assessment subtasks involved Adaptability and Self-Management Schooled Unschooled Schoolness. Independent OR Collaborative Collaboration. Untimed Timed Time. Is the time to solve the problem constrained? Page 78 Share Cite. Review of Sample Assessment Tasks. Page 79 Share Cite.

Page 80 Share Cite. Science Achievement Task. Page 81 Share Cite. Is it likely that this was a research question for the study? Yes or No? What has to be done to pasteurize milk? Citizenship Diversity. Knowledge Society, education. MET:Andragogy Behaviourist. Information Processing. Cognitive Approaches to Learning. Sociocultural-Constructivist Developmental Approaches to Learning. Social Learning Theory. Brain-based Learning. Cognitive Apprenticeship. Information Seeking Knowledge Building.

Instructional Design. We are spending a lot of time, energy, and resources on building out some type of system that captures student classwork, [including] information from all the various apps we use. Does the technology assist us in fostering collaboration between students, teachers, and perhaps experts in the field? In the collaborative nature of what we do in the classroom, does technology play a role in that? Does it help foster critical thinking skills?

Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings - From Pearson, this report summarizes peer-reviewed research published in education and psychology in order to answer several questions about 21st century skills, including how do researchers define them and how do researchers traditionally measure them, and make recommendations regarding how best to assess these skills.

State of EdTech K Student Assessments - From EdSurge this research report section describes that the current testing ecosystem is in flux and everyone is frustrated from teachers to students. Grading Soft Skills: The Brookings Soft Skills Report Card - This report demonstrates the value of having measures of soft skills that are simple and close to the classroom.

Student characteristics captured in a report card frequently produce artifacts in available administrative records that can be used for system-wide accountability. The resource hub has tools, stories, videos, and examples from districts engaged in this effort. Innovative school systems are experimenting with novel approaches to curriculum, instruction, teacher training, school schedules, and the design of learning Students and teachers use many education applications in schools.